﻿• 91 •:@0.847517:0.946969:0.881079:0.946969:0.881079:0.932706:0.847517:0.932706:0.005339:0.003814:0.007628:0.007628:0.003814:0.005339
 :@0.000973:0.067670:0.005263:0.067670:0.005263:0.051624:0.000973:0.051624:0.004291
» :@0.659223:0.071740:0.672095:0.071740:0.672095:0.055694:0.659223:0.055694:0.008581:0.004291
第四章 自由民主理性批判:@0.672095:0.072126:0.869460:0.072126:0.869460:0.058778:0.672095:0.058778:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162:0.008581:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162
  :@0.723582:0.073066:0.732163:0.073066:0.732163:0.057020:0.723582:0.057020:0.004291:0.004291
 :@0.869460:0.073066:0.873751:0.073066:0.873751:0.057020:0.869460:0.057020:0.004291
如果多数就是民主，这种民主就是对的，那么，当年希特勒和墨索里尼上台也可:@0.175676:0.119342:0.880810:0.119342:0.880810:0.103257:0.175676:0.103257:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023
以说是民主的胜利，可是它却给人类带来了亘古未有之灾难，请问这种多数是对的吗？:@0.135135:0.143897:0.881081:0.143897:0.881081:0.127812:0.135135:0.127812:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.012568:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.012566:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
这种民主是正确的吗？是人类需要的吗？往上说，公元前:@0.135135:0.168451:0.639483:0.168451:0.639483:0.152367:0.135135:0.152367:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020023:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020023:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020023:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020023
399:@0.644388:0.169492:0.674422:0.169492:0.674422:0.150771:0.644388:0.150771:0.010011:0.010011:0.010011
年，在民主的发源地古:@0.679468:0.168451:0.881135:0.168451:0.881135:0.152367:0.679468:0.152367:0.020023:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020023
希腊，西方世界的精神导师苏格拉底不是被由:@0.135135:0.193006:0.542073:0.193006:0.542073:0.176922:0.135135:0.176922:0.020383:0.020023:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020023
500:@0.547119:0.194046:0.577153:0.194046:0.577153:0.175326:0.547119:0.175326:0.010011:0.010011:0.010011
名公民组成的陪审团以:@0.582238:0.193006:0.785708:0.193006:0.785708:0.176922:0.582238:0.176922:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020383:0.020023
360:@0.790773:0.194046:0.820807:0.194046:0.820807:0.175326:0.790773:0.175326:0.010011:0.010011:0.010011
比:@0.825893:0.193006:0.845915:0.193006:0.845915:0.176922:0.825893:0.176922:0.020023
140:@0.851001:0.194046:0.881035:0.194046:0.881035:0.175326:0.851001:0.175326:0.010011:0.010011:0.010011
票的压倒性优势判处死刑的吗？请问，这种多数人的判决是正确的吗？放在今天会是:@0.135135:0.217561:0.881255:0.217561:0.881255:0.201477:0.135135:0.201477:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
什么决定和结果？耶稣又是怎么死的，巡抚彼拉多认为他无罪，想放他，可众人却要:@0.135135:0.242116:0.881095:0.242116:0.881095:0.226031:0.135135:0.226031:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
求将他钉上十字架！不是“君”“主”了他的死，而是“民”“主”了他的死！这不:@0.135135:0.266671:0.881085:0.266671:0.881085:0.250586:0.135135:0.250586:0.020213:0.020211:0.020213:0.020211:0.020213:0.020213:0.020211:0.020023:0.020213:0.020213:0.020023:0.020211:0.020119:0.020023:0.020211:0.020119:0.020211:0.020213:0.020213:0.020211:0.020023:0.020213:0.020213:0.020023:0.020211:0.020117:0.020024:0.020211:0.020119:0.020211:0.020213:0.020213:0.020211:0.020023:0.020213:0.020211:0.020023
是民主吗？不是少数服从多数吗？这就对了吗？西方的选举是以多数取胜，然而事实:@0.135135:0.291225:0.881095:0.291225:0.881095:0.275141:0.135135:0.275141:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
证明，选举时一时形成的多数并不稳固，因为人口越多，人民的兴趣和利益就越复杂，:@0.135135:0.315780:0.891092:0.315780:0.891092:0.299696:0.135135:0.299696:0.020023:0.020023:0.018389:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.018391:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.018389:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
也就越难形成一个巩固的多数。美国:@0.135135:0.340335:0.459701:0.340335:0.459701:0.324250:0.135135:0.324250:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020023:0.020323:0.020323:0.020023
2019:@0.464806:0.341375:0.504851:0.341375:0.504851:0.322655:0.464806:0.322655:0.010011:0.010011:0.010011:0.010011
年盖洛普民调显示，只有:@0.509937:0.340335:0.732888:0.340335:0.732888:0.324250:0.509937:0.324250:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020023:0.020323:0.020323:0.020023
32%:@0.737994:0.341375:0.774695:0.341375:0.774695:0.322655:0.737994:0.322655:0.010011:0.010011:0.016679
的民众支持:@0.779781:0.340335:0.881095:0.340335:0.881095:0.324250:0.779781:0.324250:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020323:0.020023
现有政治体制，是所有调查项目中最低的。而同年:@0.135135:0.364890:0.578674:0.364890:0.578674:0.348805:0.135135:0.348805:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
7:@0.583820:0.365930:0.593832:0.365930:0.593832:0.347209:0.583820:0.347209:0.010011
月:@0.598877:0.364890:0.618900:0.364890:0.618900:0.348805:0.598877:0.348805:0.020023
2:@0.623945:0.365930:0.633957:0.365930:0.633957:0.347209:0.623945:0.347209:0.010011
日公布的哈佛大学的民调则:@0.639002:0.364890:0.881035:0.364890:0.881035:0.348805:0.639002:0.348805:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
显示，特朗普在共和党中的支持率是很高，但在民主党中的支持率却跌至:@0.135135:0.389444:0.779100:0.389444:0.779100:0.373360:0.135135:0.373360:0.020133:0.020023:0.020133:0.020143:0.020133:0.020133:0.020133:0.020133:0.020133:0.020143:0.020133:0.020133:0.020133:0.020133:0.020143:0.020133:0.020133:0.020023:0.020133:0.020133:0.020143:0.020133:0.020133:0.020133:0.020133:0.020133:0.020143:0.020133:0.020133:0.020133:0.020133:0.020023
13%:@0.784086:0.390484:0.820787:0.390484:0.820787:0.371764:0.784086:0.371764:0.010011:0.010011:0.016679
，请问:@0.820787:0.389444:0.881075:0.389444:0.881075:0.373360:0.820787:0.373360:0.020133:0.020133:0.020023
这种总统能代表美国的多数吗？:@0.135135:0.413999:0.415451:0.413999:0.415451:0.397915:0.135135:0.397915:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
从世界历史来看，从一国的政治和发展的需要来看，有些局部的、区域性的甚至:@0.175676:0.438554:0.880810:0.438554:0.880810:0.422469:0.175676:0.422469:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023
民族性的多数并不代表正义和进步。据说，台湾:@0.135135:0.463109:0.551402:0.463109:0.551402:0.447024:0.135135:0.447024:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.017920:0.020023:0.020023:0.017918:0.020023:0.020023
80%:@0.555889:0.464149:0.592590:0.464149:0.592590:0.445429:0.555889:0.445429:0.010011:0.010011:0.016679
的人不喜欢“一个中国”，你说，:@0.597075:0.463109:0.891104:0.463109:0.891104:0.447024:0.597075:0.447024:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.017920:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.017918:0.017920:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
这种多数的民主是真理、公道和正义吗？台当局据此拒不承认“九二共识”，顽固坚:@0.135135:0.487664:0.881017:0.487664:0.881017:0.471579:0.135135:0.471579:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020105:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
持“台独”立场，这是历史的进步还是历史的倒退？如果以多数来衡量，是对还是错？:@0.135135:0.512218:0.881081:0.512218:0.881081:0.496134:0.135135:0.496134:0.016294:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.016296:0.020023:0.020023:0.016294:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.016294:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
今天的伊拉克库尔德自治区公民有:@0.135135:0.536773:0.437155:0.536773:0.437155:0.520689:0.135135:0.520689:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020023
99.2%:@0.442101:0.537813:0.493819:0.537813:0.493819:0.519093:0.442101:0.519093:0.010011:0.010011:0.005006:0.010011:0.016679
的选民投票赞成独立，请问这是不是民主？:@0.498845:0.536773:0.881195:0.536773:0.881195:0.520689:0.498845:0.520689:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020023:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020143:0.020023:0.020023
国际社会如何看待这种民主？如何应对这种民主？据说美国有的州长也扬言要脱离联:@0.135135:0.561328:0.881125:0.561328:0.881125:0.545243:0.135135:0.545243:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020023:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020023:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020023
邦而独立建国。我在上文已经说过，如果各国都允许这种独立的自主自由，世界将面:@0.135135:0.585883:0.881255:0.585883:0.881255:0.569798:0.135135:0.569798:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
临怎样的局面，我们必将重新回到小国林立、大国争霸血流成河的战乱时代，历史将:@0.135135:0.610438:0.881255:0.610438:0.881255:0.594353:0.135135:0.594353:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
倒退，一切陈腐落后和野蛮的东西都将死灰复燃！:@0.135135:0.634992:0.575631:0.634992:0.575631:0.618908:0.135135:0.618908:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
世界是复杂的，很多是非和问题不是简单地以人数多寡来判断和解决的，在社会:@0.175676:0.659547:0.880950:0.659547:0.880950:0.643462:0.175676:0.643462:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023
冲突和矛盾中，很可能冲突双方的意见都是错误的，也可能所有的人都同意了一种错:@0.135135:0.684102:0.881125:0.684102:0.881125:0.668017:0.135135:0.668017:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020023:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020023:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020023
误的意见，而另一些没有表达出来的观点才可能是真实的，或接近真实的。多数也非:@0.135135:0.708657:0.881255:0.708657:0.881255:0.692572:0.135135:0.692572:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
代表主流，主流一定是代表历史前进方向的。举个例子，以全球治理来说，如果在联:@0.135135:0.733211:0.881095:0.733211:0.881095:0.717127:0.135135:0.717127:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
合国实行 “一国一票制”，根据这种制度，一位马尔代夫群岛的公民就比一位中国的:@0.135135:0.757766:0.881075:0.757766:0.881075:0.741682:0.135135:0.741682:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.005106:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
 :@0.215225:0.758806:0.220231:0.758806:0.220231:0.740086:0.215225:0.740086:0.005006
公民享有:@0.135135:0.782321:0.216787:0.782321:0.216787:0.766236:0.135135:0.766236:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020023
1000:@0.221893:0.783361:0.261938:0.783361:0.261938:0.764641:0.221893:0.764641:0.010011:0.010011:0.010011:0.010011
倍以上的选举权，这民主吗？这种多数票通过的决议就是正确的吗？:@0.267064:0.782321:0.881265:0.782321:0.881265:0.766236:0.267064:0.766236:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020023:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020023:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020533:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020543:0.020023:0.020023
再比如，把“一人一票制”推至世界政府，把全世界视为一个选区，其中:@0.135135:0.806876:0.780630:0.806876:0.780630:0.790791:0.135135:0.790791:0.020203:0.020203:0.020023:0.020203:0.020023:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020111:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020023:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020023:0.020203:0.020203:0.020023
199:@0.785587:0.807916:0.815621:0.807916:0.815621:0.789196:0.785587:0.789196:0.010011:0.010011:0.010011
个国家:@0.820667:0.806876:0.881095:0.806876:0.881095:0.790791:0.820667:0.790791:0.020203:0.020203:0.020023
的公民愿意在投票中始终被:@0.135135:0.831431:0.377288:0.831431:0.377288:0.815346:0.135135:0.815346:0.020193:0.020193:0.020193:0.020193:0.020203:0.020193:0.020193:0.020193:0.020193:0.020193:0.020193:0.020023
14:@0.382333:0.832471:0.402356:0.832471:0.402356:0.813750:0.382333:0.813750:0.010011:0.010011
亿中国人和:@0.407402:0.831431:0.508195:0.831431:0.508195:0.815346:0.407402:0.815346:0.020193:0.020193:0.020193:0.020193:0.020023
13:@0.513241:0.832471:0.533263:0.832471:0.533263:0.813750:0.513241:0.813750:0.010011:0.010011
亿印度人压倒吗？这种多数民主吗？那:@0.538309:0.831431:0.881093:0.831431:0.881093:0.815346:0.538309:0.815346:0.020193:0.020193:0.020193:0.020193:0.020203:0.020193:0.020020:0.020203:0.020193:0.020193:0.020193:0.020193:0.020193:0.020193:0.020023:0.020193:0.020023
些少数怎么办？这就需要综合平衡、统筹兼顾、统一领导的集中民主来解决。:@0.135135:0.855985:0.815902:0.855985:0.815902:0.839901:0.135135:0.839901:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
众所周知，没有德国的统一，就没有德国的今日。请问：德国的统一是靠多数票:@0.175676:0.880540:0.881270:0.880540:0.881270:0.864456:0.175676:0.864456:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
通过的吗？:@0.135135:0.905095:0.235791:0.905095:0.235791:0.889010:0.135135:0.889010:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020024:0.020023
1862:@0.240854:0.906135:0.280899:0.906135:0.280899:0.887415:0.240854:0.887415:0.010011:0.010011:0.010011:0.010011
年:@0.285945:0.905095:0.305967:0.905095:0.305967:0.889010:0.285945:0.889010:0.020023
9:@0.311013:0.906135:0.321024:0.906135:0.321024:0.887415:0.311013:0.887415:0.010011
月:@0.326070:0.905095:0.346093:0.905095:0.346093:0.889010:0.326070:0.889010:0.020023
30:@0.351138:0.906135:0.371161:0.906135:0.371161:0.887415:0.351138:0.887415:0.010011:0.010011
日，俾斯麦在就任普鲁士宰相时曾说过一句至今依然响遍:@0.376207:0.905095:0.880915:0.905095:0.880915:0.889010:0.376207:0.889010:0.020023:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020023