• 182 •:@0.118919:0.946969:0.160108:0.946969:0.160108:0.932706:0.118919:0.932706:0.005339:0.003814:0.007628:0.007628:0.007628:0.003814:0.005339
On Centralized Democracy —Taking China as an Example:@0.179757:0.081230:0.450417:0.081230:0.450417:0.070402:0.179757:0.070402:0.008261:0.005721:0.002860:0.007631:0.005080:0.005721:0.003181:0.004451:0.005721:0.003181:0.003181:0.004451:0.005080:0.005721:0.002860:0.008261:0.005080:0.008261:0.005721:0.005080:0.004451:0.005721:0.005080:0.005080:0.002860:0.010171:0.005310:0.005721:0.005080:0.003181:0.005721:0.005721:0.002860:0.007631:0.005721:0.003181:0.005721:0.005721:0.002860:0.005721:0.004451:0.002860:0.005721:0.005721:0.002860:0.006991:0.005080:0.005721:0.008261:0.005721:0.003181:0.005080
论集中民主——以中国为例:@0.118811:0.070987:0.324757:0.070987:0.324757:0.057677:0.118811:0.057677:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162:0.017162
反而陷入动荡的深渊。:@0.118919:0.119342:0.319144:0.119342:0.319144:0.103257:0.118919:0.103257:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
美国最近的抗议乱象和乱局反映出一个事实，就是西方的“人民主权”并未如他:@0.159460:0.143897:0.864667:0.143897:0.864667:0.127812:0.159460:0.127812:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020097:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023
们的理论和宣传所言真正到来。一人一票并不能自动跟人民主权画上等号，一人一票:@0.118919:0.168451:0.864909:0.168451:0.864909:0.152367:0.118919:0.152367:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020023:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020023:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020023
只是表面的平等，并不是事实上的平等。例如，世界上绝大多数国家都是多民族的，:@0.118919:0.193006:0.864879:0.193006:0.864879:0.176922:0.118919:0.176922:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020023
在多民族甚至多种族的背景下，各民族、各种族的人数是不等的，一人一票怎么能天:@0.118919:0.217561:0.865039:0.217561:0.865039:0.201477:0.118919:0.201477:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
然体现民族、种族平等？:@0.118919:0.242116:0.339167:0.242116:0.339167:0.226031:0.118919:0.226031:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
历史上西方的治理成功，并不能归功于自由民主，而应归功于做大了中产阶层，:@0.159460:0.266671:0.864593:0.266671:0.864593:0.250586:0.159460:0.250586:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023:0.020023
二战后到:@0.118919:0.291225:0.199550:0.291225:0.199550:0.275141:0.118919:0.275141:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020023
20:@0.204595:0.292265:0.224618:0.292265:0.224618:0.273545:0.204595:0.273545:0.010011:0.010011
世纪:@0.229664:0.291225:0.269889:0.291225:0.269889:0.275141:0.229664:0.275141:0.020203:0.020023
70:@0.274935:0.292265:0.294957:0.292265:0.294957:0.273545:0.274935:0.273545:0.010011:0.010011
年代，无产阶级成了工人阶级，工人阶级变成中产阶级，这个社:@0.300003:0.291225:0.864959:0.291225:0.864959:0.275141:0.300003:0.275141:0.020203:0.020023:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020023:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020023:0.020203:0.020203:0.020203:0.020023
会就稳定多了；德国搞社会保障法，也是政治精英们为了社会稳定主动去做的，而不:@0.118919:0.315780:0.865039:0.315780:0.865039:0.299696:0.118919:0.299696:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
是一人一票促成的；还有一些国家的福利制度也是这种情形。可以说，现在西方国家:@0.118919:0.340335:0.865039:0.340335:0.865039:0.324250:0.118919:0.324250:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
的基本制度，绝大多数都是在一人一票制之前搞成的。:@0.118919:0.364890:0.599460:0.364890:0.599460:0.348805:0.118919:0.348805:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
世界和平系于国家的领导人，但是，我们看到随着短视、激进和缺乏经验的人获:@0.159460:0.389444:0.864591:0.389444:0.864591:0.373360:0.159460:0.373360:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023:0.020163:0.020163:0.020021:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020163:0.020023
得越来越大的权力，世界和平体系面临着越来越大的压力。特朗普政府明知气候变暖:@0.118919:0.413999:0.864909:0.413999:0.864909:0.397915:0.118919:0.397915:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020023:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020023:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020023
的危害，却悍然退出《巴黎协定》，放宽作为危险化石燃料的煤炭的使用限制，这种:@0.118919:0.438554:0.864801:0.438554:0.864801:0.422469:0.118919:0.422469:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020105:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
只要眼前能挣钱，就不顾将来的态度，是负责任的大国应有的吗？这是为人类为民主:@0.118919:0.463109:0.865039:0.463109:0.865039:0.447024:0.118919:0.447024:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
吗？这简直是邪恶！欧美都是民选政治，在民粹主义的鼓噪之下，政治素人纷纷上台，:@0.118919:0.487664:0.874876:0.487664:0.874876:0.471579:0.118919:0.471579:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.017574:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.017572:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
谁能保证不会出来第二个希特勒呢？而中国永远也不会产生像特朗普这样的领导人。:@0.118919:0.512218:0.864909:0.512218:0.864909:0.496134:0.118919:0.496134:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020023:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020023:0.020023
因为在民主制度下，只要获得足够多的选票，你就是领袖，但在中国不行。中国的政:@0.118919:0.536773:0.864879:0.536773:0.864879:0.520689:0.118919:0.520689:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
治体系向全社会开放，但必须一步步来，一级级来，如果让没有任何工作经验和政治:@0.118919:0.561328:0.865039:0.561328:0.865039:0.545243:0.118919:0.545243:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
历练的人进入中南海，他如何治理整个国家？:@0.118919:0.585883:0.519370:0.585883:0.519370:0.569798:0.118919:0.569798:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
在西方人的认识中，他们认为政治现代化最重要的测度标志就是“政治参与”，:@0.159460:0.610438:0.865030:0.610438:0.865030:0.594353:0.159460:0.594353:0.020183:0.020173:0.020183:0.020183:0.020173:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020173:0.020183:0.020183:0.020173:0.020183:0.020183:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020183:0.020183:0.020173:0.020183:0.020183:0.020173:0.020183:0.020183:0.020173:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020173:0.020183:0.020183:0.020099:0.020023:0.020023
一种政治制度只有其公民被允许投票才能被视为现代的。进而，投票的自由明确地同:@0.118919:0.634992:0.864909:0.634992:0.864909:0.618908:0.118919:0.618908:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020023:0.020183:0.020173:0.020023:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020183:0.020173:0.020173:0.020173:0.020023
自由选择各种类型的候选人、方案和政党、政策联系在一起。而西方的一人一票又是:@0.118919:0.659547:0.865039:0.659547:0.865039:0.643462:0.118919:0.643462:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
建立在选民都是理性人的假设基础上的。可问题是：选民个个都是理性的和正确的吗？:@0.118919:0.684102:0.864865:0.684102:0.864865:0.668017:0.118919:0.668017:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.012568:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.016294:0.016294:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
非也！许多人的上台，其实都是造势活动影响的结果，而并不是理性的选择。很多西:@0.118919:0.708657:0.864881:0.708657:0.864881:0.692572:0.118919:0.692572:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020024:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
方国家的选民，常常不投票，而且不投票的往往是年轻人。布鲁金学会的汤姆·曼说：:@0.118919:0.733211:0.869872:0.733211:0.869872:0.717127:0.118919:0.717127:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.017822:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.017822:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.017822:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.018923:0.018921:0.020023:0.018921:0.020023
“投票人数少会产生糟糕的政治。”请问，这部分不投票的人怎么说？是他们自动放:@0.118919:0.757766:0.864879:0.757766:0.864879:0.741682:0.118919:0.741682:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
弃民主，还是他们根本不赞成这种民主？但若采取另一种民主方式，就可能获取他们:@0.118919:0.782321:0.865039:0.782321:0.865039:0.766236:0.118919:0.766236:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
的真实意愿。选出的领导人都是理性和合乎政治要求的吗？亦非也。民选官员为了选:@0.118919:0.806876:0.865039:0.806876:0.865039:0.790791:0.118919:0.790791:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
票，有求和有惧于选民，这极容易导致竞选者为了巴结大多数而瞎承诺，或是一味迁:@0.118919:0.831431:0.865039:0.831431:0.865039:0.815346:0.118919:0.815346:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020183:0.020023
就选民，放弃人民的长远利益而采取短期行为，许多西方政府的短视思维和短期行为，:@0.118919:0.855985:0.874876:0.855985:0.874876:0.839901:0.118919:0.839901:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.017574:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.017572:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
正是这种选举制度造成的必然结果。:@0.118919:0.880540:0.439280:0.880540:0.439280:0.864456:0.118919:0.864456:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023
民选政治的另一恶果，就是造成社会分裂，政局动荡，政策常变，甚而影响世界。:@0.159460:0.905095:0.874877:0.905095:0.874877:0.889010:0.159460:0.889010:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.018675:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.018673:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.018673:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.018675:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023:0.020023