Page 168 - A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:An Intermediary-oriented Approach
P. 168

A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:                                                                                                     Chapter 6 UGC Platforms’ Entitlement to UGCs
              An Intermediary-oriented Approach

              5.6 Conclusions

                 Although UGCs are available to the public through the peer-to-peer network, the
              majority of UGCs do not conflict with the normal exploitation of copyrighted works. These
              UGCs should not be subject to the realm of proprietary copyright. To prevent the chilling
              effect of copyright from stifling UGC creation, this chapter proposed a levy scheme under
              which users can use copyrighted works to engage in non-commercial UGC creation.
              Copyright owners cannot sue non-commercial UGC creators covered by the levy scheme,
              but can obtain a third-party determined amount of remuneration from UGC platforms and
              other devices and services whose value has been substantially enhanced by facilitating UGC
              creation. By highlighting the role of various types of intermediaries such as UGC platforms,
              MCNs and copyright CMOs, in paying, collecting and distributing levies, this proposed
              levy scheme promises freedom to a large number of users without unreasonably prejudicing
              the legal interests of copyright owners, and without placing unreasonable burden on UGC
              platforms. This is consistent with the intermediary-oriented approach throughout copyright
              history in coping with large-scale unauthorised use of copyrighted works. The development
              of content identification technology, and effectively-supervised CMOs with economies of
              scale, can ensure the feasibility of the levy scheme.
                 The proposed non-commercial UGC creation levy system, as well as the proposed non-
              commercial UGC access levy system in Chapter 4, also have inherent inefficiency, such as
              cross-subsidisation and administrative costs incurred by CMOs. However, no solution can
              achieve perfection across all dimensions in the real world that is constructed of transaction
                                                    246
              costs, bounded rationality and opportunism.  By enlarging the scope of leviable devices
              and services, strengthening the supervision of CMOs, enhancing CMOs’ technical capacity
              and clarifying their legal obligations, the inefficiencies of the levy schemes can be alleviated.
              Levy is at least a ‘second-best’ solution compared with the current proprietary regime and
              other alternatives.















              246  Oliver E. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press 1998) xii, 32, 45, 47. Bounded rationality is ‘a
                 semistrong form of rationality in which economic actors are assumed to be “intendedly rational, but only limitedly so”’.
                 Bounded rationality signifies that all planning by human is necessarily incomplete. Opportunism refers to ‘the incomplete
                 or distorted disclosure of information, especially to calculated efforts to mislead, distort, disguise, obfuscate, or otherwise
                 confuse’. Opportunism is ‘a condition of self-interest seeking with guile’. Because of opportunism, promise will be
                 predictably broken down.


              • 154 •
   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173