Page 149 - A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:An Intermediary-oriented Approach
P. 149

A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:   Chapter 5 Formulating a Non-commercial UGC Creation Levy Scheme
 An Intermediary-oriented Approach

                 to the requirement of Berne Convention. 122
                    The Berne Convention established two requirements for a permitted use: (i) it should not
                 intervene in the normal exploitation of the work, and (ii) it should not unreasonably prejudice
                                                           123
                 the legitimate interests of the copyright owner.  The ‘normal exploitation’ requirement
                 is more concerned with the scope of permitted use, which is discussed in this section. The
                 ‘unreasonable prejudice’ requirement is more associated with the remuneration of copyright
                 owners, which is discussed in Section 5.4.3.  In this section, I would first explain why
                                                        124
                 most UGCs can be covered by the proposed levy scheme and why the levy scheme should
                 be proposed to facilitate UGC creation. Discussion of the specific standards to determine
                 whether a UGC can be covered by the levy scheme is followed.
                    The difference between non-commercial UGC creation covered by the proposed levy
                 scheme and private copying under the current levy scheme has two aspects: (i) UGC creation
                 not only reproduces but re-creates the copyrighted work, and (ii) a UGC is publicly available
                 for everyone connected to the Internet. Incorporating re-creative use into levy schemes
                 benefits rather than prejudices copyright owners because re-creative use is more likely to
                 constitute fair use than mere reproductions. What has been more controversial is the public
                                                                                             125
                 availability of UGCs because public use usually falls under copyright owners’ control,
                 which is the reason why the existing levy scheme merely covers private reproduction.
                    Nevertheless, this thesis argues that in the context of UGC, making the copyrighted
                 works contained in UGCs publicly available does not necessarily lead to interference with
                 the copyright owners’ normal exploitation of the copyrighted works. In the pre-UGC age,
                 because of the considerable expense involved with mass producing physical copies, only the
                 content that attracted a broad market had the opportunity to be published and distributed.
                 In the UGC age, due to the zero marginal cost of producing and uploading content, every
                 UGC becomes public use in the technological sense because every UGC has the potential
                 for worldwide distribution. However, this is not public use in the legal sense given that most
                 UGCs do not appeal to the mainstream market and thus they have no substantial effect on the
                 market for the copyrighted works. Considering the tension between the overabundance of



                 122  Berne Convention, art 9(2).
                 123  Article 9(2) of the Berne Convention establishes a three-step test. In addition to the requirements on ‘normal exploitation’
                    and ‘unreasonable prejudice’ discussed in this Section, the Berne Convention also requires that the permitted sue should be ‘in
                    certain special cases.’ (Berne Convention, art 9(2) ‘It shall be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to permit
                    the reproduction of such works in certain special cases, provided that such reproduction does not conflict with a normal
                    exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author.’) The test of ‘in certain
                    special cases’ requires that the permitted use should have specific purpose. See Daniel Gervais, ‘Making Copyright Whole: A
                    Principled Approach to Copyright Exceptions and Limitations’ (2008) 5 Univeristy of Ottawa Law & Technology Jounal 1,
                    25-27. Since the levy schemes proposed in this thesis merely cover the access and use of copyrighted works for the purpose
                    of creating non-commercial UGC, such access and use under the proposed levy schemes can pass the test of ‘in certain
                    special cases’.
                 124  Gervais, ‘Making Copyright Whole’ (n 123) 29.
                 125  Gervais, ‘The Tangled Web of UGC’ (n 10) 855.


                                                                                          • 135 •
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154