Page 151 - A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:An Intermediary-oriented Approach
P. 151

A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:   Chapter 5 Formulating a Non-commercial UGC Creation Levy Scheme
 An Intermediary-oriented Approach

                                                                              135
                 inquired into whether the user has paid the customary price for the work.  The line between
                 commercial/non-commercial use has become even more blurred in the UGC age, because of
                 the increasing commercialisation of UGCs, the wide availability of electronic payment and
                 micro payment, and the unlimited scope of potential users. It is easy for UGC creators to
                 cross from the non-commercial side to the commercial side, just as how they cross from the
                 private side to the public side, from the user side to the creator side. 136
                    However, following the requirement of Berne Convention, this thesis argues that the
                 basic principle in defining a leviable non-commercial UGC is to ensure that the UGC
                                                                                 137
                 would not conflict with the normal exploitation of copyrighted works.  As the courts
                 have pointed out, the focus should be on whether the UGC creator ‘capture[s] significant
                                                                       138
                 revenues as a direct consequence of copying the original work’.  Gaining profits or having
                 the intention to gain profits alone would not exclude UGC creators from the levy scheme.
                 Courts have even noted that ‘many, if not most, secondary users seek at least some measure
                                               139
                 of commercial gain from their use’.  Even the illustrative uses listed in the fair use and fair
                 dealing provisions, such as news reporting, comment, criticsism and research, are ultimately
                                  140
                 conducted for profit.  Many UGC platforms also provide various ways to encourage UGC
                 creators to monetise their UGCs.  Because of the prosperous business model of C2C
                                               141
                 (customer-to-customer) and the popularity of electronic payment, UGC creators can earn
                                                              142
                 profits much easier than users in the pre-Internet age.  For example, any UGC creator with
                 an Apple pay or Alipay account can earn profits in various forms such as through advertising
                                      143
                 fees and fans’ rewards.  As no service fees are charged, the profits can be in a small
                 amount, which in turn encourages micro payment. UGC commercialisation is not only a


                 135  Commercial use would be found if the user "profit[ed] from the exploitation of the copyrighted work without paying the
                    customary prices." Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539, 562, 105 S. Ct. 2218, 2231 (1985);
                    Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley Ltd., 448 F.3d 605, 612 (2d Cir. 2006); Cambridge Univ. Press v. Patton, 769 F.3d
                    1232, 1265 (11th Cir. 2014).
                 136  Gervais, ‘The Tangled Web of UGC’ (n 10) 845.
                 137  Arista Records v. Myxer, NO. CV 08-03935 GAF (JCx), *7; Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, 660 F.3d 487,
                        st
                    498 (1  Cir. 2011).
                 138  American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, 60 F.3d 913, 922 (2d Cir. 1995); Blanch v. Koons, 467 F.3d 244, 253 (2d Cir. 2006);
                    Cariou v. Prince, 714 F.3d 694, 708 (2d Cir. 2013); Graham v. Prince, 265 F. Supp. 3d 366, 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2017).
                 139  Am. Geophysical Union v. Texaco Inc., 60 F.3d 913, 921 (2d Cir. 1994); see also Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S.
                    569, 571, 114 S.Ct. 1164, 1174 (1994); Maxtone–Graham v. Burtchaell, 803 F.2d 1253, 1262 (2d Cir.1986).
                 140  Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S 539, 592 (1985); Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 571, 114
                    S.Ct. 1164, 1174 (1994).
                 141  Lizzie Davey, ‘Everything You Need to Know About Monetizing User-Generated-Content’ (Tine, 25 October 2016) <https://
                    www.tintup.com/blog/user-generated-content-monetization/> accessed 10 July 2019. The online survey I conducted shows
                    that more than 10% of UGC creators have made profits from their UGC. Question 13 and 27 in Appendix 1.
                 142  Andreas Rivera, ‘What is C2C?’ (Business News Daily, 20 July 2018) <https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/5084-what-is-
                    c2c.html> accessed 12 July 2019. (‘Consumer to consumer, or C2C, is the business model that facilitates commerce between
                    private individuals.’).
                 143  Sharon Kinder, ‘8 Ways to Encourage More User-Generated-Content’ (Single Grain) <https://www.singlegrain.com/content-
                    marketing-strategy-2/8-ways-to-encourage-more-user-generated-content-ugc/> accessed 12 July 2019.


                                                                                          • 137 •
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156