Page 349 - A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:An Intermediary-oriented Approach
P. 349

A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:                                Bibliography
 An Intermediary-oriented Approach

                 –––, ‘Legal Protection of Technological Measures Protecting Works of Authorship:
                    International Obligations and the US Experience’ (2005) Columbia Public Law & Legal
                    Theory Working Papers Paper 0593
                 –––, ‘The Pros and Cons of Strengthening Intellectual Property Protection: Technological
                    Protection Measures and Section 1201 of the US Copyright Act’ (2007) Columbia Public
                    Law & Legal Theory Working Papers
                 –––, ‘User-Generated Content Sites and Section 512 of the US Copyright Act’ in Stamatoudi
                    IA (ed), Copyright Enforcement and the Internet (Kluwer Law International 2010)
                 Goldstein P, ‘Copyright’s Commons’ (2005) 29 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 1
                 Goodman EP, ‘Media Policy out of the Box: Content Abundance, Attention Scarcity, and the
                    Failures of Digital Markets’ (2004) 19 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1389
                 Gorski D, ‘The Future of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) Subpoena Power
                    on the Internet in Light of the Verizon Cases’ (2005) 24 The Review of Litigation 149
                 Grimmelmann J, ‘Consenting to Computer Use’ (2016) 84 George Washington Law Review
                    1500
                 Haber E, ‘The French Revolution 2.0: Copyright and the Three Strikes Policy’ (2010) 2
                    Harvard Journal Sports & Entertainment Law 297
                 Hall MA and Wright RF, ‘Systematic Content Analysis of Judicial Opinions’ (2008) 96
                    California Law Review 63
                 Heald P, ‘How Notice-and-Takedown Regimes Create Markets for Music on YouTube: An
                    Empirical Study’ (2014) 83 UMKC Law Review 313
                 Heide T, ‘Copyright in the EU and U.S.: What Access-Right’ (2001) 48 Journal of the
                    Copyright Society of the USA 363
                 Helberger N and Hugenboltz PB, ‘No Place like Home for Making A Copy: Private Copying
                    in European Copyright Law and Consumer Law’ (2007) 22 Berkeley Technology Law
                    Journal 1062
                 Heller MA, ‘The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to
                    Markets’ (1998) 111 Harvard Law Review 621
                 Hert PD and others, ‘The Right to Data Portability in the GDPR: Towards User-Centric
                    Interoperability of Digital Services’ (2018) 34 Computer Law & Security Review 193
                 Hesse C, ‘The Rise of Intellectual Property, 700 BC-AD 2000: An Idea in the Balance’ (2002)
                    131 Daedalus 26
                 Hetcher S, ‘User-Generated Content and the Future of Copyright: Part One—Investiture of
                    Ownership’ (2008) 10 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law 863
                 –––, ‘User-Generated Content and the Future of Copyright: Part Two-Agreements Between
                    Users and Mega-Sites’ (2007) 24 Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal
                    829
                 –––, ‘The Kids Are Alright: Applying a Fault Liability Standard to Amateur Digital Remix’
                    (2010) 62 Floridaa Law Review 1275
                 –––, ‘Desire without Hierarchy: The Behavioral Economics of Copyright Incentives’ (2010)



                                                                                          • 335 •
   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354