Page 353 - A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:An Intermediary-oriented Approach
P. 353

A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:                                Bibliography
 An Intermediary-oriented Approach

                 Patterson LR, ‘Free Speech, Copyright, and Fair Use’ (1987) 40 Vanderbilt Law Review 1
                 Pessach G, ‘Copyright Law as a Silencing Restriction on Noninfringing Materials: Unveiling
                    the Scope of Copyright’s Diversity Externalities’ (2003) 76 Southern California Law
                    Review 1067
                 –––, ‘Deconstructing Disintermediation: A Skeptical Copyright Perspective’ (2012) 31
                    Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 833
                 Peukert A, ‘A Bipolar Copyright System for the Digital Network Environment’ (2005) 28
                    Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal 1
                 Picker RC, ‘Fair Use v. Fair Access’ (2008) 31 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 603
                 Presseller S, ‘Copyright Infringement Via Social Media Live Streaming Shortcomings of
                    the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’ (2017) 7 Arizona State University Sports and
                    Entertainment Law Journal 357
                 Price MO, ‘Photocopying by Libraries and Copyright: A Precis’ (1960) 8 Library Trends 432
                 Reese RA, ‘The First Sale Doctrine in the Era of Digital Networks’ (2003) 44 Boston
                    College Law Review 577
                 Rich GS, ‘Principles of Patentability ’ (2004) 14 Federal Circuit Bar Journal 135
                 Riley KC, ‘Data Scraping as a Cause of Action: Limiting Use of the CFAA and Trespass in
                    Online Copying Cases’ (2019) 29 Fordham Intellectual Property Media & Entertainment
                    Law Journal 245
                 Rodríguez-Doncel Víctor and others, ‘Legal Aspects of Linked Data—The European
                    Framework’ (2016) 32 Computer Law & Security Review 799
                 Rosenbloom RS and Cusumano MA, ‘Technological Pioneering and Competitive Advantage:
                    The Birth of the VCR Industry’ (1987) 29 California Management Review 51
                 Rostama G, ‘Remix Culture and Amateur Creativity: A Copyright Dilemma’ [2015] WIPO
                    Magazine 22
                 Russ M, ‘Problematically Proactive: a Summary of Recent Legal Developments In the Field
                    of Internet Intermediary Liability’ (2018) 69 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 563
                 Rustad ML and others, ‘An Empirical Study of Predispute Mandatory Arbitration Clauses in
                    Social Media Terms of Service Agreements’ (2012) 34 University of Arkansas at Little
                    Rock Law Review 643
                 Rustad ML and Koenig TH, ‘Harmonizing Cybertort Law for Europe and America’ (2005) 5
                    Journal of High Technology Law 13
                 Samuelson P, ‘Intelletual Property and the Digital Economy: Why the Anti-Circumvention
                    Regulations Need to Be Revised’ (1999) 14 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 519
                 –––, ‘Digital Rights Management {and, or, vs.} the Law’ (2003) 46 Communications of the
                    ACM 1
                 Sellars A, ‘Twenty Years of Web Scraping and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act’ (2018)
                    24 Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law 372
                 Seltzer W, ‘The Imperfect Is the Enemy of the Good: Anticircumvention Versus Open User
                    Innovation’ (2010) 25 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 909



                                                                                          • 339 •
   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358