Page 63 - A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:An Intermediary-oriented Approach
P. 63

A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:   Chapter 2 Copyright in the Pre-Internet Age: An Intermediary-oriented Approach
 An Intermediary-oriented Approach

                 without limitation printers, photocopiers, faxes, scanners, compact cassettes, tapes, CDs,
                 audio recording devices, video cassettes, DVDs, video recording devices, memory chips,
                                              228
                 hard disks and personal computers.
                                                                                          229
                    Although levy schemes and compulsory licensing are often mentioned jointly,  an
                 essential but overlooked distinction between them is that levy schemes are imposed on
                 distributors who do not use copyrighted works but merely provide devices and services
                 that facilitate users’ use of copyrighted works. Conversely, compulsory licensing enforces
                 copyright law against distributors who are direct users. A primary reason levy schemes
                 have been introduced is that advances in new technology have led to a shift in the ability to
                 reproduce copyrighted works from professional distributors to large numbers of end users.
                 However, it is more reasonable and efficient to collect licensing fees from the professional
                 intermediate distributors who facilitate and profit from the end users’ use than to directly
                 collect them from the large numbers of end users whose use is normally for non-commercial,
                 personal purposes and has a marginal influence on the market for the copyrighted works.
                 The distributors who facilitate end users’ use of the works can raise the sale price of relevant
                 devices and services, and to compensate for the levies paid to copyright owners.  Therefore,
                                                                                    230
                 levy schemes have become more tailored to the technologies that have democratised the
                 ability to use copyrighted works.
                    When the distributors were direct users, the intermediary-oriented rules such as the
                 collective licence, compulsory licence, ‘reasonable fee’ claims and ‘maximum compensation’
                 threshold, attempted to reach a balance between securing the producers’ revenue and
                 promoting the development of new distribution technology. This also ensured the users’
                 access to the copyrighted works. When the distributors became the device or service
                 providers that facilitated users’ use, the intermediary-oriented rules such as the levy schemes
                 secured the end users’ freedom to access and use copyrighted works.

                 2.4 Conclusions

                    By exploring the history of cultural production and dissemination from the pre-copyright
                 era to the end of the pre-Internet copyright age, this chapter showed how copyright law
                 addressed large amount of unauthorized use through an intermediary-oriented approach for
                 centuries. Every time new technology emerged, courts and legislature have strived to balance
                 the incentives of producers to produce copyrighted works and the incentives of distributors

                 228  Hugenholtz, Guibault and van Geffen (n 119) 64.
                 229  For example, a report by an IPO in the UK suggested that there is no substantial difference between levies and compulsory
                    licences. Kretschmer (n 120) 60; Neil Netanel used ‘private copying levies’ and ‘compulsory licences’ jointly in his article
                    ‘Impose a Non-commercial Use Levy to Allow Free Peer-to-Peer File Sharing’ without clarifying their differences. Neil
                    W. Netanel, ‘Impose a Noncommercial Use Levy to Allow Free Peer-to-Peer File Sharing’ (2003) Harv Journal of Law &
                    Technology 1, 31-35; More discussion in Chapter 5.
                 230  Nevertheless, according to a report issued by an IPO in the UK, the price of leviable devices in competitive markets such as
                    printers and photocopiers would not be influenced by levy schemes. Kretschmer (n 120) 64.


                                                                                           • 49 •
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68