Page 85 - A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:An Intermediary-oriented Approach
P. 85

A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:   Chapter 3 Copyright Rules for Online Intermediaries: From Safe Harbour to a New Intermediary Liability Scheme
 An Intermediary-oriented Approach

                 the user sent the query to the indexing server, and then the server told the user which peers
                                                  165
                 had the content available for download.  Upon sending the query, the user also informed the
                                                                            166
                 indexing server what files s/he had available for others to download.  The key difference
                 between the centralised P2P system and the client-server mode is that the central server in
                 the P2P system locates the information but does not store or transfer it. Simply put, searching
                 is centralised, but file transfers are peer-to-peer.
                                                         167
                    The second generation of P2P providers have worked within a hybrid network without
                               168
                 a central server.  In the hybrid P2P system, each peer is called a ‘node’ and each node
                 is assigned to one ‘supernode’.  The ‘supernodes’ are similar to the index servers in the
                                            169
                 centralised P2P system in that they do not store or transfer files.  A search query sent by a
                                                                        170
                 node would go to the supernode that would forward the query to other supernodes and then
                 tell the requested node what nodes have the expected content.  A typical example of the
                                                                       171
                                                                                             172
                 hybrid P2P protocol is FastTrack, on which Grokster’s software application was based.
                 BitTorrent is another example of a hybrid P2P protocol, which has been more efficient at
                 transmitting files by breaking them into smaller pieces, so users can download different
                 pieces from different peers simultaneously. 173
                    The third generation of P2P providers has developed a ‘pure’ P2P network that allows
                                                                                             174
                 users to directly search the files of other users without a centralised server or ‘supernodes’.
                 Under the pure P2P networks, users’ queries are sent to several neighbour peers who
                                                                                         175
                 continue to pass on the queries while responding to the requesting user’s question.  The
                 most popular pure P2P protocol has been Gnutella, which has been used by StreamCast to
                 power its software application, Morpheus. 176
                    P2P service providers have continually updated their technological infrastructure to
                 meet the demanding safe harbour threshold, and the legal standard has also evolved with
                 the technological advances. Some courts have elevated the threshold for exemption, by for
                 example, restricting the applicability of the Sony safe harbour to the knowledge of infringing
                 activities (Napster), or establishing ‘authorisation’ merely through a general ability to control


                 165  Ibid.
                 166  Ibid.
                 167  RIAA v. Verizon, 351 F.3d 1229, 1232 (D.C. Cir. 2003).
                 168  Vondran (n 164).
                 169  Ibid.
                 170  Ibid.
                 171  Ibid.
                 172  MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913, 921 (2005).
                 173  Ibid.
                 174  RIAA v. Verizon, 351 F.3d 1229, 1232 (D.C. Cir. 2003).
                 175  Vondran (n 164).
                 176  RIAA v. Verizon, 351 F.3d 1229, 1232 (D.C. Cir. 2003).


                                                                                           • 71 •
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90