Page 31 - Feasibility Study of New Media Technology on Constructing Online Public Sphere
P. 31

Chapter 2. Literature review


            the role of the media from the perspective of information equality, indicating that a

            good public sphere function for the mass media offers access for citizens to engage in
            rational and critical discussion and to obtain information about the actions and proceed-
            ings of governmental institutions.
                 Another contribution of the media in the public sphere is publicity (Chambers,
            2000). Since information garnered from the public sphere reflects the interest of various

            groups in society, disseminating such information through the mass media can attract
            extensive attention from the public. It also draws the public to examine the issue, which
            positively influences the generation of rational and critical deliberations within the pub-

            lic sphere, rather than turbulent and irrational invective. Because the media represents
            public opinion, it offers opportunities for people to articulate their views that conse-
            quently shape government actions (Curran, 1991).
                 However, Habermas (1989) questioned whether the mass media, especially the
            commercial broadcast media, can isolate individuals from each other and impede cit-

            izens from coming together for vibrant discussion. This may lead to a threat to the
            physical existence of communities with shared interests and opinions in public life, and
            there are potential risks in transmitting and amplifying ‘the rational-critical debate of

            private people assembled into a public’ (Habermas, 1989, p.188). As a result, Habermas
            blamed the mass media for the collapse of the public sphere, where the public is divid-
            ed into ‘minorities of specialists who put their reason to use non-publicly and the great
            mass of consumers whose receptiveness is public but uncritical’ (Habermas, 1989,
            p.175). In other words, the media splits the public into intellectuals and grassroots,

            which is inconsistent with the premises in the construction of the public sphere. Mass
            media intervention may also manipulate the public sphere and lead to a manufactured
            public sphere, which may not be able to achieve the goal of influencing a government’s

            actions (Wu, 2007).
                 Although Habermas (1989) criticised commercial media for the decreased in-
            fluence of the public sphere, the media did perform as a social platform in connecting
            individuals, increasing participation, expanding the realm of debates, and forming ra-
            tional critical public opinion (Garnham, 2000; Curran, 2002). Technology development



                                                                                    15
                                                                                    15
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36