Page 355 - A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law：An Intermediary-oriented Approach

A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law: Bibliography
An Intermediary-oriented Approach

Wang RL-D, ‘DMCA Anti-Circumvention Provisions in a Different Light: Perspectives from
Transnational Observation of Five Jurisdictions’ (2006) 34 AIPLA Quarterly Journal 217
Ware SJ, ‘The Case for Enforcing Adhesive Arbitration Agreements—with Particular
Consideration of Class Actions and Arbitration Fees’ (2006) 5 The Journal of American
Arbitration 251
Waters AJ, ‘The Property in the Promise: A Study of the Third Party Beneficiary Rule’ (1985)
98 Harvard Law Review 1109
Weatherall GK, ‘A Comment on the Copyright Exceptions Review and Private Copying’
(June 2005). IPRIA Working Paper No. 14/05. Available at SSRN: <https://ssrn.com/
abstract=815328> or <http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.815328>
White E, ‘The Berne Convention’s Flexible Fixation Requirement: A Problematic Provision
for User-Generated Content’ (2013) 13 Chicago Journal of International Law 685
Williams JL, ‘Automation Is Not ‘Hacking’: Why Courts Must Reject Attempts to Use the
CFAA As an Anti-Competitive Sword’ (2018) 24 Boston University Journal of Science
and Technology Law 416
Wolff WI, ‘Interactivity and the Invisible: What Counts as Writing in the Age of Web ’ (2013)
30 Computers and Composition 211
Wong MWS, ‘Transformative User-Generated Content in Copyright Law: Infringing
Derivative Works or Fair Use?’ (2008) 11 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment &
Technology Law 1075
Young JE, ‘Copyright and the New Technologies—The Case of Library Photocopying’ (1982)
28 ASCAP Copyright Law Symposium 51
Zhang F, ‘The State of China’s Collective Rights Management in the Context of the United
States and Japan’ (2016) 1 Global Media and China 401, 404.

Cases

A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 114 F. Supp.2d 896 (N.D. Cal. 2000).
th
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004, 1011, 1027 (9 Cir. 2001)
Aibang v. Dianping (2009) Yi Min Zhong Zi No.5031 Civil Ruling
Aibang v. Dianping (2014) Gao Min Shen Zi No. 00837 Civil Ruling
Alan Ross Mach. Corp. v. Machinio Corp., 2018 WL 3344364 (N.D. Ill. July 9, 2018)
Alberto-Culver Co. v. Andrea Dumon, Inc., 466 F.2d 705, 710 n.2 (7 Cir. 1972)
th
ALS Scan, Inc. v. RemarQ Communities, Inc.239 F.3d 619 (4 Cir. 2001)
th
America Online, Inc. v. Superior Court, 108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 699, 701−02 (Cal. App. 2001)
American Express v. Italian Colors Restaurant, 133 S. Ct. 2304 (2013)
American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, 60 F.3d 913 (2d Cir. 1995)
Apple Computer, Inc. v. Formula Int’l, 594 F. Supp. 617 (C.D. Cal. 1984)
Aral v. Earthlink, Inc., 36 Cal. Rptr. 3d 229 (Cal. App. 2d 2005)
Arista Records LLC v. Myxer Inc., Case No. CV 08–3935–GAF (JCx), 2011 U.S. Dist.

• 341 •