Page 141 - Feasibility Study of New Media Technology on Constructing Online Public Sphere
P. 141

Chapter 5. The Sun Zhigang incident


            core force’ in civil society. They gathered together in the form of reading groups and

            openly expressed their views on public affairs.
                 As discussed above, the turning point in the Sun Zhigang case was when legal
            experts and scholars filed a petition to the NPCSC. Before the two rounds of formal
            petitions were filed, legal experts and lawyers discussed the problems involved in the
            Sun Zhigang case in online forums and meetings. They actually formed a small civil

            society group that made its way to the NPCSC and delivered the voice of the public to
            the authorities, whereas the general public’s discussion and participation in the case can
            be considered as ‘grassroots civil society’ that was stimulated by the evolution of ICT,

            which enabled equal participation in such a centralism state. The only difference is that
            public participation in China takes place in cyberspace, whereas in western countries, it
            usually takes the form of offline activities.
                 Oldenburg (1997) coined the term ‘the third place’ to refer to the physical area
            where citizens can participate in and discuss social, political and public affairs. It is a

            generic designation where ‘regular, voluntary, informal, and happily anticipated gath-
            erings of individuals’ are hosted (Oldenburg, 1997, p.16). Thus, the third place here
            can be treated as the area where citizens can participate and discuss social, political and

            various public affairs in the real world. Since it is extremely difficult to form an assem-
            bly to discuss sensitive topics like the Sun Zhigang case in China, the creation of a ‘third
            place’ as a public medium for citizens to congregate for information exchange or form
            public opinions is hardly possible. Individuals who organise or attend a real-world as-
            sembly may face penalties from the government.

                 The internet, according to Tai (2006, p.169-171) was seen as the ‘fourth place’ for
            the following reasons:
                 •   It created a brand-new social space as opposed to the history of human com-

                    munication in the ‘third space’ and traditional media communication; new
                    communicative possibilities and new social relationships were cultivated.
                 •   internet-based communication extends beyond relations in the physical world
                    and redefines them. The internet is both informational and participational,
                    hence, it brings people together and invites the participation of those who



                                                                                    125
                                                                                    125
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146