Page 359 - A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law：An Intermediary-oriented Approach

A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law: Bibliography
An Intermediary-oriented Approach

Fteja v. Facebook, Inc.,2012 WL 183896 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2012)
GEMA v. RapidShare I ZR 79/12 (Bundesgerichtshof, Aug. 16, 2013,)
Grand Upright Music, Ltd. v. Warner Bros. Records, Inc., 780 F. Supp. 182 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)
Green Tree Fin. Corp.-Ala. V. Randolph, 531 U.S. 79 (2000)
Greg Young Publishing, Inc. v. Zazzle, Inc., 2017 WL 2729584 (C.D. Cal. May 1, 2017);
Gregory Selden v. Airbnb, 2016 WL 6476934 (D.C.D.C. Nov. 1, 2016).
th
Goldberg v. R.J. Longo Const. Co., Inc, 54 F.3d 243 (5 Cir. 1995)
Goldstein v. Calfornia, 412 U.S. 546 (1973)
Gumi v. Yuanguang (2017) Yue 03 Min Chu No.822 Civil Judgement
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539, 565 (1985)
Heisley et al. v. Eastman et al., 102 Or. 137, 201 P. 872 (1921)
Hempton v. Pond5, Inc. et al., 3:15-cv-05696-BJR (W.D. Wash. Jan. 13, 2017)
th
Higgins v. Superior Court, 140 Cal. App. 4 1238, 45 Cal. Rptr. 3d 293 (Ct. App. 2006)
Hines v. Overstock.com, Inc., 668 F. Supp. 2d 362 (E.D.N.Y. 2009)
hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp., 273 F. Supp.3d 1099 (N.D. Cal. 2017)
HR Tech., Inc. v. Imura Int’l U.S.A., Inc., Case No. 08-2220-JWL (D. Kan. December 1,
2010)
Hubbert v. Dell Corp. 359 Ill. App. 3d 976, 835 N.E.2d 113 (Ill App 5 Dist., August 12,
2005).
IceTV Pty Ltd. v. Nine Network Austl. Pty Ltd. [2009] HCA 14 (Austl.)
In re Aimster Copyright Litigation., 334 F.3d 643, 651 (7 Cir. 2003);
th
In re Verizon Internet Services, 240 F. Supp. 2d 24 (D.D.C. 2003)
th
In re Charter Communications, 393 F.3d 771, 777 (8 Cir. 2005)
In re Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data Sec. Breach Litigation, 893 F.Supp.2d 1058 (D. Nev.
2012)
Infopaq v Danske Dagblades Forening, C-5/08, 16 July 2009(‘Infopaq I’)
Infopaq v Danske Dagblades Forening, C-302/10, 17 January 2010 (‘Infopaq II’)
Intel Corp. v. Hamidi, 30 Cal. 4th 1342, 1357, 71 P.3d 296 (2003)
Interlego AG v Tyco Industries Inc [1989] AC 217
International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U.S. 215, 219 (1918).
Interscope Records v. Does 1-7,. 494 F. Supp. 2d 388 (E.D. Va. 2007)
Io Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc., 586 F. Supp. 2d 1132 (N.D. Cal. 2008)
Jarvis v. A&M Records, 827 F. Supp. 282, 292 (D.N.J. 1993)
Jerome H. Remick & Co. v. General Electric Co., 16 F.2d 829 (S.D.N.Y. 1926)
Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros., 222 U.S. 55 (1911)
th
Karo v. San Diego Symphony Orchestra Ass’n, 762 F.2d 819 (9 Cir. 1985)
th
Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., 280 F.3d 934 (9 Cir. 2002)
Key Publ’ns, Inc. v. Chinatown Today Publ’g Enters., Inc., 945 F.2d 509 (2d Cir. 1991)
Klocek v. Gateway, Inc., 104 F. Supp. 2d 1332 (D. Kan. 2000)
Koch v. Am. Online, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 2d 690 (D. Md. 2000)

• 345 •