Page 360 - A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law：An Intermediary-oriented Approach

A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law: Bibliography
An Intermediary-oriented Approach

Lee v. Lozier, 945 P.2d 214 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997)
Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., No. C 07-3783 JF, 2008 WL 4790699 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28,
2008)
th
Lexmark Int’l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., 387 F.3d 522 (6 Cir. 2004)
Lieschke v. Realnetworks, Inc., 2000 WL 198424 (ND Ill.)
London Press, Ltd v University Tutorial Press, Ltd., [1916] 2 Ch 601
Long v. Provide Commerce, Inc., 200 Cal. Rptr. 3d 117, 122-23 (Ct. App. 2016)
th
MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc, 991 F.2d 511, 516 (9 Cir. 1993)
Major v. McCallister, 302 S.W.3d 227, 235 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Mavrix Photographs, LLC v. Livejournal, Inc. 873 F.3d 1045 (2017);
Meyer v. Uber Techs., Inc. 868 F.3d 66 (2d Cir. 2017)
th
MDY Industries v. Blizzard Entertainment, 629 F.3d 928 (9 Cir. 2010)
Meijing v. Taobao, (2018) Zhe 01 Min Zhong No.7321 Civil Judgement
MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. (Grokster II), 125 S. Ct. 2764 (2005);
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614 (1985)
th
Nano-Proprietary Inc. v. Canon, Inc., 537 F.3d 394 (5 Cir., 2008)
th
Nesbitt v. FCNH, Inc., 811 F.3d 371 (10 Cir., 2016)
Net Global Mktg. v. Dialtone, Inc., No. 04-56685, 217 Fed. Appx. 598, 2007 U.S. App.
LEXIS 674 at *7 (9 Cir. Jan. 9, 2007)
th
Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., 763 F.3d 1171 (9 Cir. 2014)
th
nd
Nicosia v. Amazon.com, 834 F.3d 220, 233 (2 Cir. 2016)
nd
Nihon Keizai Shimbum, Inc. v. Comline Bus. Data, Inc., 166 F.3d 65 (2 Cir. 1999)
th
Norcia v. Samsung Telecom, 845 F.3d 1279 (9 Cir. 2017)
Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc., 337 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (N.D. Cal. 2004)
Oppenheimer v. Allvoices, Inc., No. C 14-499 LB, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80320 (N.D. Cal.
June 10, 2014)
Oyster Software, Inc. v. Forms Processing, Inc., No. C-00-0724 JCS, 2001 WL 1736382 (N.D.
Cal. Dec. 6, 2001)
Packingham v. North Carolina, 137 S.Ct. 1730 (2017)
Parker v. Google, Inc., 422 F. Supp. 2d 492 (E.D. Pa. 2006)
Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union v. Fifth Third Bank, 398 F. Supp. 2d 317 (M.D.
Pa. 2005)
th
Perfect 10 Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146 (9 Cir. 2007)
Perfect 10, v. CCBill, 340 F. Supp. 2d 1077 (C.D.Cal. 2004);
th
Perfect 10, Inc. v. CCBill LLC, 488 F.3d 1102 (9 Cir.2007)
Perfect 10, Inc. v. Cybernet Ventures, Inc., 213 F. Supp. 2d 1146 (C.D. Ca., April 22, 2002).
Perfect 10, Inc. v. Google, Inc., No.CV 04 9484 AHM (SHx) (C.D. Cal. 2010)
Perotti v. Corr. Corp. of Am, 290 P.3d 403 (Alaska 2012)
Personalausweise, German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof), GRUR 02/1965,
104 (Germany)

• 346 •