Page 821 - 先天性心脏病的导管术:从婴幼儿期到成人期
P. 821

64 先天性心导管实验室的质量改进工具和风险降低                                                  803



                   影响力的进步,但仍需要做更多的工作来确保提供最佳的护理服务,并在不牺牲程序
                   效率的情况下继续关注以患者为中心的结果。




                   参考文献

                   [1]  Langley GJ, Moen RD, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP. In: Langley

                       GJ, editor. The improvement guide a practical approach to enhancing organizational
                       performance. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009.
                   [2]  Institute for Healthcare Improvement: Open School. IHI Open School: The science of
                       improvement on a whiteboard! Institute for Healthcare Improvement Open School;

                       2019.
                   [3]  Moore JW, Vincent RN, Beekman RH III, et al. Procedural results and safety of com-
                       mon interventional procedures in congenital heart disease: initial report from the Na-
                       tional Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(23):2439.51. https://

                       doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.045.
                   [4]  Cevallos PC, Rose MJ, Armsby LB, et al. Implementation of methodology for quality
                       improvement in pediatric cardiac catheterization: a multicenter initiative by the congeni-
                       tal cardiac catheterization project on outcomes-quality improvement (C3PO-QI). Pediatr

                       Cardiol. 2016;37(8):1436-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-016-1454-z.
                   [5]  Martin GR, Anderson JB, Vincent RN. IMPACT Registry and National Pediatric Car-
                       diology Quality Improvement Collaborative: Contributions to Quality in Congenital
                       Heart Disease. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2019;10(1):72-80. https://doi.

                       org/10.1177/2150135118815059.
                   [6]  Nykanen DG, Forbes TJ, Du W, et al. CRISP: catheterization risk score for pediatrics: a
                       report from the Congenital Cardiac Interventional Study Consortium (CCISC). Catheter
                       Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87(2):3029. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26300.

                   [7]  Quinn BP, Armstrong AK, Bauser-Heaton HD, et al. Radiation risk categories in cardiac
                       catheterization for congenital heart disease: a tool to aid in the evaluation of radiation
                       outcomes. Pediatr Cardiol. 2019;40(2):445-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-018-
                       2024-3.

                   [8]  Ghelani SJ, Glatz AC, David S, et al. Radiation dose benchmarks during cardiac cath-
                       eterization for congenital heart disease in the United States. JACC Cardiovasc Interv.
   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826