Page 363 - A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:An Intermediary-oriented Approach
P. 363

A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law:                                Bibliography
 An Intermediary-oriented Approach

                    09-0692-cv (xap), 09-1572-cv (xap) (2d Cir. 2010)
                 United States v. BMI, 1940-1943 Trade Cas. (CCH) ¶ 56, 096 (E.D. Wisc. 1941)
                                                  th
                 United States v. Nosal, 642 F.3d 781 (9  Cir. 2011)
                                                   th
                 United States v. Nosal, 844 F.3d 1024 (9  Cir. 2016)
                                                         th
                 Ventura Content v. Motherless, 885 F.3d 597 (9  Cir., 2018)
                 Venus Fashions, Inc. v. ContextLogic, Inc., No. 3:16-CV-907-J-39MCR, 2017 U.S.. Dist.
                    Vernon v. Qwest Communications Intern., Inc. 925 F. Supp. 2d 1185, 1192 (D. Colo. Feb.
                    27, 2013)
                 Viacom International, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F.3d 19 (2d Cir. 2012)
                 Vereniging BUMA, Stichting STEMRA v KaZaA B.V. [2004] E.C.D.R. 16
                 VG WORT (C 457/11 to C-460/11, 27/6/2013)
                 Walter v. Lane [1900] AC 539
                 Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. and J. K. Rowling v. RDR Books, 575 F.Supp.2d 513, 550
                    (S.D.N.Y. 2008)
                                                      st
                 Waters v. Earthlink, Inc., 91 F.App’x 697 (1  Cir. 2003)
                 Weimeng v. Taoyou (2016) Jing 73 Min Zhong No. 588 Civil Judgement
                 Wentworth-Douglass Hosp. v. Young & Novis Prof’l Ass’n, No. 10–CV–120–SM, 2012 WL
                    2522963 (D.N.H. June 29, 2012)
                 Williams Electronics, Inc. v. Artic Intl, Inc. 685 F 2d 870 (3  Cir., 1982)
                                                                   rd
                 William & Hallisey v. American Online Communities, No. 99-CIV-3785 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 10,
                    2006)
                 Williams & Wilkins Co. v. United States, 487 F.2d 1345 (Ct. Cl. 1973)
                 White-Smith Music Publishing Company v. Apollo Company, 209 U.S. 1, 11 (1908)
                 White v. West Publishing Corp., 1:12-cv-01340-JSR (S.D.N.Y. July 3, 2014)
                 Whitt v. Prosper Funding LLC, 2015 WL 4254062 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2015)
                 Wolk v. Kodak Imaging Network, Inc., 840 F. Supp. 2d 724 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2012)
                 Xiecheng v. Qunaer (2009) Yi Zhong Min Zhong Zi No. 5525 Civil Ruling
                 Xu Lixia v. Anshun Lvzhou (2015) Qian Gao Min Shang Zhong Zi No. 61Civil Judgement
                 Zhong Qin Wen v. Baidu (2014) Gao Min Zhong Zi No. 2045 Civil Judgement


                 Theses and reports
                 A Report of the Register of Copyrights, ‘Section 1201 of Title 17’ (US, 2017) 61 < https://
                    www.copyright.gov/policy/1201/section-1201-full-report.pdf> accessed 19 January 2019
                 Bills Committee on the Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2014: User-Generated Content, LC
                    Paper No. CB(4)100/14-15(01) (UK, 2014) <https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr13-14/english/
                    bc/bc106/papers/bc1061104cb4-100-1-e.pdf> accessed 15 May 2019
                 European Commission, Evaluation of Directive 96/9/EC on the Legal Protection of
                    Databases (EU, 2018)
                 Green Paper on Copyright Policy, Creativity, and Innovation in the Digital Economy (US,
                    2013).



                                                                                          • 349 •
   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368