Page 362 - A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law：An Intermediary-oriented Approach

A Study on the Role of UGC Platforms in Copyright Law: Bibliography
An Intermediary-oriented Approach

Steven M. Gardner, v. CafePress Inc., Case No. 3:13-cv-1108-GPC-JMA (2014);
th
Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 268 F.3d 1257 (11 Cir. 2001)
Southwest Airlines Co. v. Boardfirst, LLC, No. 3:06-CV-0891-B, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
96230, 2007 WL 4823761 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 12, 2007)
Swift v. Zynga Game Networks, Inc., 805 F. Supp.2d 904 (2011)
Taobao v. Meijing (2018) Zhe 01 Min Zhong No.7312 Civil Judgement
Tele-Direct (Publications) Inc. v. American Business Information, Inc., [1998] 2 FC 22, 1997
CanLII 6378 (FCA)
Teleprompter Corp. v. Columbia Broad. Sys., Inc., 415 U.S. 394 (1974)
Television Digest, Inc. v. United States Telephone Assoc., 841 F. Supp. 5 (D.D.C. 1993
Telstra Corp. Ltd. v. Desktop Mktg. Sys. Pty Ltd. [2001] FCA. 612 (Austl.)
Telstra Corp. Ltd. v. Phone Directories Co. Pty Ltd. [2010] FCA 44 (Austl.)
The British Horseracing Board and Others v William Hill, ECLI:EU:C:2004:695, C-203/02
Ticketmaster Corp. v. Tick-ets.com, Inc., No. CV99-7654, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6483, 2003
WL 21406289 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2003)
Ticketmaster L.L.C. v. Prestige Entm’t W., Inc., No. 2:17-CV-07232-ODW-JC, 2018 WL
2448115, (C.D. Cal. May 29, 2018)
Ticketmaster v. RMG Technologies, 507 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (C.D. Cal., 2007)
Timeline, Inc. v. Proclarity Corp., No. C05-1013JLR (W.D. Wash., May 29, 2007)
th
Tinney v. City of Detroit, No. 98-1510 (6 Cir., 1999)
Top Rank, Inc. v. Gutierrez, 236 F. Supp. 2d 637 (2001)
Topsteptrader, LLC v. OneUp Trader, LLC, No. 1:2017cv04412 – Document 17 (N.D. Ill.
2017)
Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. Aiken, 422 U.S. 151 (1975)
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp v British Telecommunications [2011] EWHC 1981 (Ch),
[2012] 1 All ER 806
Tur v. YouTube, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50254, 2007 WL 1893635 (C.D. Cal. June 20,
2007)
th
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Shelter Capital Partners LLC, 718 F.3d 1006 (9 Cir. 2013)
th
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc., 718 F.3d 1006 (9 Cir 2013)
Universal Athletic Sales Co. v. Salkeld, 511 F.2d 904, 907 (3d Cir.1975)
Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d. Cir. 2001)
United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367 (1968)
United States v. Valle, 807 F.3d 508 (2d Cir. 2015)
Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, 82 F. Supp. 2d 211 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)
Universal City Studios v. Reimerdes, 111 F. Supp. 2d 294 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)
Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman License Holdings Ltd. [2005] FCA 1242
United States v. Elcom Ltd., 203 F. Supp.2d 1111 (N.D. Cal.2002)
United States v. ASCAP, 1940-43 Trade Cas. ¶56,104 (S.D.N.Y. 1941)
United States v. ASCAP, Docket Nos. 09-0539-cv (L), 09-0542-cv (con), 09-0666-cv (xap),

• 348 •